Key constraints:
1. **Language**: Perfect Polish, no Anglicisms, correct declension, syntax, punctuation (max 20 words/sentence, max 25 words absolute limit). Autocorrection mandatory.
2. **Perspective**: Integral Catholic faith (pre-1958), sedevacantist view (See vacant since 1958). Current „pope” is Antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost). Post-1958 hierarchy are „posoborowie” (pseudo-bishops/priests). Novus Ordo Mass is invalid/simulated. SSPX/FSSP are schismatics within the neo-church.
3. **Style**: Polemical, erudite, authoritative. 85% destruction of error, 15% construction of truth. Use Latin terms with translation.
4. **Structure**:
* `[KATEGORIA] Title` (Category from list: Posoborowie, Kurialiści, Duchowość, Świat, Polska). This article is about Warsaw Uprising on a Polish portal (Opoka), so category likely „Polska” or „Kurialiści” (since Opoka is a „posoborowy” portal). The article is historical/political but published on a „Catholic” portal. I’ll choose „Polska” as it deals with Polish history, but the critique will focus on the portal’s naturalistic framing. Actually, „Kurialiści” is for „wszelkie sprawy i newsy z antykościoła w Polsce”. Opoka is a portal of the „posoborowy” church in Poland. So „Kurialiści” fits better for criticizing the portal’s take. But the article content is historical. The instruction says: „Kurialiści to wszelkie sprawy i newsy z antykościoła w Polsce”. This is a news item on a Polish anti-church portal. I will use **Kurialiści**.
* `Content`
* `TAGS: …`
5. **Content Requirements**:
* Summary (zajawka) + `
